Mrs Warren’s Profession

Shaw’s defense of prostitution as a suitable and sensible option for women with good looks and no training or skills probably seemed logical, even sensible, when it was written. Today the arguments have much less power since women have so many more choices. But still today there are many stories of young women who earn the money they need for tuition by prostituting themselves. And other young women lacking education or desperate to get out of repressive regimes are lured into prostitution in such numbers that human trafficking stories are frequently on the front pages. So the arguments rage on.

Let us ignore the argument and consider the production. Good but not great would be my summary.  I think it suffers from a lack of commitment to a point of view.

The play is updated to a contemporary men’s club, to referto the fact that the first production was staged in a club because the Lord Chamberlain refused permission for a play about an unrepentant prostitute to be performed in a public theatre. So begins the shifting viewpoints.

If the play is contemporary, the shock and contempt expressed by Vivie is inappropriate. It was much more believable in Shaw’s time when ideas of morality were much more rigid. Jennifer Dzialoszynski presents her as a modern young woman, but not today’s modern. She is still in the early twentieth century. At the end, you are left wondering when she will grow up and develop some compassion to go with her principles.

Nicole Underhay as Mrs Warren is more believable, as her arguments still ring true today. She manages to be funny, cynical, passionate and sad, sometimes all in the same scene. My sympathy and understanding stayed with her to the end.

Thom Marriott was excellent as Sir George Crofts. Wade Bogert O’Brien did his usual great job of playing the young romantic lead. This is particularly difficult in this play as Frank often behaves like a complete ass. Gray Powell and Sean Wright completed the cast as Praed and the Reverend Gardner.

Overall, I enjoyed it, but I would have have taken quite a different approach.

Advertisements

About cathyriggall

Theatre junkie, who thinks live theatre is the ultimate form of living on the edge. You never know what will happen when an actor steps on the stage.
This entry was posted in Shaw 2016, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Mrs Warren’s Profession

  1. keithhpotter says:

    I think Shaw, more than prostitution per se, was focused on the hypocrisy of society, and its ability to turn a blind eye to anything that makes money, while not acknowledging in explicitly, and on the limited opportunities for women in general. I think the spotlight on the hypocrisy was more of a problem for The Lord Chamberlain than the prostitution.

    I generally like the play, although, like typical Shaw, sometimes the lecture gets in the way of the play.

    I always find I lose sympathy with Vivie at the point where she is happy to forgive her mother for being a prostitute and a madam, but not for still being a madam. Mrs. Warren, whatever the reason for getting in this business, enjoys being successful at it – and more power to her! (It reminds me of “Breaking Bad”, although it took Mr. White a long time to admit the fact.)

    In this production, the cast was excellent but I found the decision to reproduce the staging in The New Lyric Gentlemen’s Club more cute than helpful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s